skip navigation

Why is Property Tax So Complicated?


February 2, 2015 by Tracey Dunlap
Category: Finance Advisor , Property Taxes

Why is Property Tax So Complicated?

This “Property Tax 101” addresses one topic - the limits on regular property taxes. The equally complex issues of how assessed valuation relates to the amount paid was clarified by Glen Olson in his property tax calculation examples and the topics of excess levies, levy lid lifts, and banked capacity can be found in MRSC’s City Revenue Guide and County Revenue Guide. This column will only scratch the surface of this complex topic and point the reader to helpful sources of more detailed information.

Limits on Property Taxes are complicated because there are so many different types of taxing districts and there have been a number of initiative and legislative actions over the years.  There are at least 30 types of taxing districts subject to different maximum levies individually and in aggregate. 

The Property Tax Levies Operations Manual provides a comprehensive list of the individual levy types and regular levy rate limits.  In addition to the individual rate limits by levy type, there is an individual statutory limit that was imposed initially through the initiative process (Initiative 747) and subsequently by the State Legislature (RCW 84.55) in 2007 after the initiative was found unconstitutional.  In a nutshell, it limits the increase in the dollar amount of the regular levy to one percent of the prior year’s levy (for cities less than 10,000) or the lesser of one percent or the implicit price deflator (IPD) for larger agencies.  New construction value and other adjustments are added after the application of the one percent.
There are two main aggregate limits that apply to property taxes, one of which is statutory and the other constitutional. 

  • The statutory limit applies to most local regular levies, which taken together, cannot exceed $5.90 per $1,000 of assessed valuation.  It is a shorter list to provide the list of those not subject to this limit (State, Ports, PUD, EMS, Affordable Housing, Conservation Futures, County Ferry Districts, Criminal Justice, and County Transit).  What this limit means is that if the sum of the applicable levies exceeds $5.90, the taxes of the “junior” taxing districts will be reduced based on the hierarchy in the sidebar.  Again, the list of “senior” taxing districts is shorter at State, County, City/Town, County Road, Port, PUD; everything else is junior.  Note that the proration as it relates to Metropolitan Park Districts (MPD) is especially complex; more information can be found at MRSC’s website.
  • The constitutional limit adopted in 1972 limits the amount of property taxes that may be imposed on an individual parcel without voter approval to one percent of its true and fair value.  The tax proration order if the aggregate is greater than one percent is more complex as it applies to all taxing authorities, except Port and PUD district levies, including those subject to the $5.90 limit.
  • The table that follows summarizes the hierarchy for applying the limits.


* Represents the portion subject to the 1% limit

In summary, property taxes are very complex, but there are resources available that can help:

It is also advisable to consult your agency’s attorney or bond counsel with questions pertinent to your jurisdiction.

Image courtesy of Emmett Anderson.


MRSC is a private nonprofit organization serving local governments in Washington State. Eligible government agencies in Washington State may use our free, one-on-one Ask MRSC service to get answers to legal, policy, or financial questions.

About Tracey Dunlap

Tracey Dunlap writes for MRSC as a Finance Advisor.

Tracey Dunlap, P.E. is Deputy City Manager at the City of Kirkland and served as Kirkland’s Director of Finance & Administration from 2006 through 2014. Prior to joining Kirkland, she was a principal and shareholder in FCS Group, a regional financial and management consulting firm (14 years). An industrial engineer registered in the state of Washington, she has worked with jurisdictions throughout the Northwest to develop and implement cost recovery and fee strategies, set utility rates, and improve organizational efficiency and effectiveness. Tracey's experience also includes working for a large defense contractor (5 years) and a major financial institution (3 years). She has presented on a wide array of topics for organizations including WFOA, APWA, APA, WABO, and AWC.

The views expressed in Advisor columns represent the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of MRSC.

VIEW ALL POSTS BY Tracey Dunlap

 more

Blog Archives

GO

Follow Our Blog