skip navigation

Another Legislative Session, Another Round of PRA Changes


May 29, 2019 by Flannary Collins
Category: Public Records Act

Another Legislative Session, Another Round of PRA Changes

The Public Records Act (PRA) is not static; it changes after each legislative session and from court decisions interpreting the PRA. You can find MRSC’s coverage of recent PRA case law on our PRA Court Decisions topic page, through our blog posts, and on our PRA topic page.

This blog reviews some of the public records bills affecting local governments from the Washington State Legislature's 2019 regular session.

HB 1667: Changes to the JLARC Reporting

Through HB 1667, the legislature reduced the number of metrics that must be reported to JLARC for public records reporting, eliminating the following:

  • Identification of leading practices and processes for records management and retention and what percentage of those were implemented by the agency.
  • The average length of time taken to acknowledge receipt of a PRA request.
  • Measuring requestor satisfaction with agency responses, communication and processes.

And, some metrics became a bit clearer. Agencies now need to track, as separate metrics:

  • The number of requests where records were provided within five days of receipt of the request; and
  • The number of requests where an agency provided a time estimate for records production beyond five days after receipt of the request.

(Previously, agencies tracked the proportion of each of these requests and responses; proportioning is no longer required.)

Agencies must also track and report the average and median number of days from receipt of the request to the date the request is closed. (Previously, agencies compared their initial estimate with the actual closure date; comparison is no longer required.)

Finally, agencies must track and report on the number of requests denied, including those denied in full or in part.

HB 1667: Sunset Eliminated for Local Government Consultation Program & Records Grant and Training Program

The original legislation in 2017 established a local government public records consultation program in the Attorney General’s Office and a local records grant program and records retention training program in the State Archivist’s Office. Those programs were to sunset on June 30, 2020, but HB 1667 has removed that sunset and made these programs permanent.

Exemption Changes

There were several bills that made changes to exemptions. 

HB 1537: Applications for Vacancies in Elected Office Not Exempt

Applications for public employment (including applicant name, resume, and other related materials) are exempt under the PRA. HB 1537 now clarifies that this exemption does not include applications submitted for vacancies in elective office. These must be released upon request.

HB 2020: Investigative Records Related to Discrimination or Harassment in Employment

The exemption in RCW 42.56.250(6) has been broadened in HB 2020 to include agency investigative records of:

  • A possible unfair practice under chapter 49.60 RCW (Discrimination-Human Rights Commission); or
  • A possible violation of other federal, state, or local laws or the agency’s internal policies prohibiting discrimination or harassment in employment.

While the investigation is ongoing, the records are categorically exempt. The records may be released after the agency has notified the complaining employee of the outcome of the investigation, but only if the names of complainants, accusers, and witnesses are redacted. If individuals consent to release of their names, the names may be released. 

HB 1505: Child Victims of Sexual Assault

RCW 42.56.240(5) and RCW 10.97.130 have expanded protections for the identity of child victims of sexual assault. Exempt information under HB 1505 has been expanded to:

  • Specific details that describe an alleged or proven child victim of sexual assault; and
  • The identity or contact information of an alleged or proven child victim of sexual assault.

The law now indicates that identifying information “includes” (rather than “means”) the victim’s name, address, location, photograph(s), and in cases where the child victim is a relative, stepchild, or stepsibling of the alleged perpetrator, identification of the relationship between the child and the alleged perpetrator. Contact information includes phone numbers, email addresses, and social media profiles (as well as usernames and passwords).

Conclusion

There were more public records related bills this legislative session, but this blog reviews those bills that are generally applicable to local governments. If you want to learn more about these and other public records bills from this legislative session, register for MRSC’s free June 19 webinar Legislative Update – 2019 Public Record Bills. This webinar will feature Nancy Krier, the Washington Attorney General’s Office Open Government Assistant Attorney General, and is being presented in partnership with the Washington Association of Public Records Officers (WAPRO).

Questions? Comments?

If you have questions about the PRA or other local government issues, please use our Ask MRSC form or call us at (206) 625-1300 or (800) 933-6772. If you have comments about this blog post, please email me at fcollins@mrsc.org.

About Flannary Collins

Flannary Collins is the Managing Attorney for MRSC. She first joined the organization as a legal consultant in August 2013 after working for ten years as the assistant city attorney for the city of Shoreline. At MRSC, Flannary enjoys providing legal guidance to municipalities through inquiry assistance and in-person trainings on municipal issues, with a heavy emphasis on the Public Records Act.

VIEW ALL POSTS BY Flannary Collins

Leave a Comment

* Required field

Security code

Comments

Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.

0 comments on Another Legislative Session, Another Round of PRA Changes

 more

Blog Archives

GO

Follow Our Blog