| A topical index to MRSC's information resources. |
Special Districts: SPD 15.2000 - Metropolitan park districts (Ch. 35.61 RCW)
Electronic Documents (15 Results)
- Resolution No. 817 - Places a ballot proposition on the November 2009 election asking Normandy Park voters to determine if a metropolitan parks district should be formed in for the purpose of operating and managing parks and recreation programs
Ordinance | Document Date: 7/09
Jurisdiction: Normandy Park, Metropolitan Park District - Short term ground lease agreement between the Tacoma Public School District and the Metropolitan Park District of Tacoma for the proper siting, design and operation of a high school in Point Defiance Park
Contracts | Document Date: 6/09
Jurisdiction: Metropolitan Park District - Interlocal agreement between the city of Port Angeles
and Clallam County for the governance of William Shore Memorial Pool District
Contracts | Document Date: 5/09
Jurisdiction: Port Angeles, Clallam County - William Shore Memorial Pool Park District election information
Other Gov Doc | Document Date: 3/09
Jurisdiction: Port Angeles, Clallam County - Resolution No. 02-09 - requesting the Auditor of Clallam County to call a special election to put the formation of a Metropolitan Park District to the voters of the City of Port Angeles and voters of Clallam County located within the boundaries of the Port Angeles School District No 121
Ordinance | Document Date: 1/09
Jurisdiction: Port Angeles - Ordinance No. 16282 - Establishes February 3, 2009, as the date for an election on the question of the formation of a metropolitan park district encompassing portions of the King County fire protection district No. 27 and various neighborhoods adjacent to the fire protection district
Ordinance | Document Date: 10/08
Jurisdiction: King County, Metropolitan Park District - Metropolitan Park District compilation: fact sheet, Resolution R47-02, notice of special election, designation of District treasurer, MPD Resolution No. 1-03, agreement between Metropolitan Park District and Pullman
Other Gov Doc | Document Date: 9/02
Jurisdiction: Metropolitan Park District, Pullman - Metropolitan Park District for the unincorporated area of Vancouver, Summary Report No. 2: summarizes the capacity of a metropolitan park district to provide mainence and capital funding for the development of urban trails and trails within the unincorporated urban area of Vancouver
Other Gov Doc | Document Date: 2/04
Jurisdiction: Metropolitan Park District - Si View Metropolitan Park District Data Sheet
Other Gov Doc | Document Date: 2/06
Jurisdiction: Metropolitan Park District - Local voter's pamphlet - Proposition No. 1 - Formation and funding of new Si View metropolitan park district
Other Gov Doc | Document Date: 2/03
Jurisdiction: King County - Resolution 47-02 Submitting a proposition to voters in September 2002 for authority to create a metropolitan park district
Ordinance | Document Date: 6/02
Jurisdiction: Pullman - Resolution No. R-74-02 Metropolitan Park District and Fact Sheet
Ordinance | Document Date: 9/02
Jurisdiction: Pullman - Resolution No. 900 - Requesting the King County Council to call a special election to put the formation of the Si View Metropolitan Park District to the voters
Ordinance | Document Date: 10/02
Jurisdiction: North Bend - Ordinance No. 14505 - Establishes February 4, 2003 as the date for an election on the question of the formation of a metropolitan park district within the city of North Bend
Ordinance | Document Date: 2002
Jurisdiction: King County - Resolution No. CE-04-09 - Calls special election to form Eastmont Metropolitan Park District.
Ordinance | Document Date: 1/27/04
Jurisdiction: Douglas County
Paper Documents (3 Results)
- Pierce County, WA Resolution No. R2004-17 calls for an election on May 18, 2004 for the purpose of submitting to voters whether to form a metropolitan park district, passed 3/23/04
Request this document | Document Date:
Jurisdiction: Pierce County, Metropolitan Park District - Agreement for services with Hebert Research, Inc, to examine the feasibility of establishing a metropolitan parks district
Request this document | Document Date: 6/03
Jurisdiction: Covington, Metropolitan Park District - Metropolitan Park District Study, by Hebert Research, Inc., September 2003. Research study to determine level of support for a MPD levy
Request this document | Document Date:
Jurisdiction: Covington, Park & Rec Service Area
MRSC Library Catalog Documents
Featured Inquiries (1 Results)
- Is the formation of a metropolitan park district limited to cities over 5,000 population?
No. The establishment of a metropolitan park district in a city is governed by the provisions in Ch. 35.61 RCW. Previously, this option was only available to cities of five thousand or more. With the passage of SHB 2557, Chapter 88, Laws of 2002, one or more cities and/or counties may create such a district for "the management, control, improvement, maintenance, and acquisition of parks, parkways, and boulevards...." The size restriction no longer applies.Ch. 88, Laws of 2002, now specifically authorizes a metropolitan park district to be formed that includes areas outside of the city, or even in another city or county. Previously, the statutes relating to formation of such a district only permitted creating a district that was "coextensive with the limits of the city." (RCW 35.61.020) Any territory annexed to a city that lies entirely within the limits of a metropolitan park district shall be deemed to be within the limits of the (expanded) park district. Formation or extension of park district boundaries is no longer subject to boundary review board (BRB) review if only city territory is involved, independent of the board's review of the city annexation (RCW 35.61.250). (A proposed district that involves area within a county will still be subject to a BRB review in counties that still have a BRB).
There are two basic methods for the formation of a metropolitan park district. The city may initiate council district formation by adopting a resolution submitting a proposition for its formation to voters within the district boundaries. If the district includes area within the county or other cities and counties, the legislative body of each city and/or county which includes a portion or all of the area in the district must adopt a resolution submitting the proposition to the voters.
Alternately, a metropolitan district may be initiated via a petition with the signatures of fifteen percent of the registered voters of the city (or area of the proposed district). The petition must be submitted to the county, and the proposition is then submitted to the voters of the city at any general, special, or city election (RCW 35.61.020). Where the petition is for creation of a district in more than one county, the original petition is filed with the county having the greater area within the district and a copy filed with each other county auditor.
Subject Pages (6 Results)
- Park & Recreation Special Districts
Lists known park and recreation districts in the state of Washington - Comparison of Recreation Districts
Compares Park and Recreation District (Ch. 36.69 RCW), Metropolitan Park District (Ch. 35.61 RCW), and Park and Recreation Service Area (RCW 36.68.400 - .620) - Metropolitan Park Districts (MPD)
History, purpose, functions and powers, formation, finance, dissolution, - Metropolitan Park District (MPD) Finance
Provides information on fiscal administration, tax authority, debt authority, compares MPD with park and recreation service areas and districts - Metropolitan Park District (MPD) Taxing Authority
Levy rate limits on property tax, one-percent constitutional property tax limit, prorationing - Financial Advantages of Metropolitan Park Districts
Financial Advantages of Metropolitan Park Districts

