RESEARCH TOOLS
› MRSC Index › General Government - Direct petition method - 60 percent (RCW 35A.14.020- .150)
 | A topical index to MRSC's information resources. |
General Government: G 3.1330 - Direct petition method - 60 percent (RCW 35A.14.020- .150)
Electronic Documents (9 Results)
- Notice of Intent to Petition for Annexation
Other Gov Doc
Bellevue - Annexation Checklist - Code cities (60 percent method)
Other Gov Doc - Ordinance No. 1818 - Providing for the annexation of certain real property commonly known as the Nintendo Annexation
Ordinance | Document Date: 12/94
Redmond - Ordinance No. 2654 assigning zoning to certain real property being annexed to the city
Ordinance | Document Date: 6/00
Puyallup - Ordinance No. 2004-22 - Annexes approximately 96.81 acres of land located at the intersections of Rude road and Urdahl road with Finn Hill road
Ordinance | Document Date: 12/16/04
Poulsbo - Resolution No. 94-182 - Pre-Annexation
Zoning Procedures
Ordinance
Jurisdiction: Mill Creek - Ordinance No. 1779 - Annexes certain real property to the city under the provisions of RCW 35A.14
Ordinance
Lynnwood - Ordinance No. 903 - Annexation Procedures
Ordinance
Lacey - Ordinance No. 97-838 - Regarding the annexation of unincorporated territory
Ordinance
Battle Ground
Paper Documents (0 Results)
- No paper documents related to this topic were found.
MRSC Library Catalog Documents
Featured Inquiries (2 Results)
- What if an annexation ordinance for a petition method annexation inadvertently describes an area that is larger than that contained in the petition?
An Attorney General opinion concluded that where an annexing ordinance described a larger parcel of property than that contained in the annexation petition, it is void. However, the annexation ordinance could be reenacted based upon the original annexing petition and hearing, where there was an inadvertent misdescription, as long as conditions had not materially changed to make the annexation less advantageous either to the city or property owners. AGO 53-55 No. 173. - How can a city know whether the legal description on an annexation petition is adequate?
The adequacy of a legal description of territory proposed for annexation is judged by whether a competent surveyor, either with or without the aid of extrinsic evidence, could ascertain the property in question. Long v. City of Olympia, 72 Wn.2d 85 (1967); McAlmond v. City of Bremerton, 60 Wn.2d 383 (1962). After review by the city engineer, many cities forward legal descriptions of proposed annexations to the county engineer early in the annexation process, requesting comments on adequacy.
Subject Pages (6 Results)
- Annexation Ordinances Using Direct Petition Method
List of Washington City and County Annexation Ordinances Using Direct Petition Method - Petition Method Annexations
List of Washington Petition Method Annexations - Annexation Ordinances Using Direct Petition Method: E - L
Annexation Ordinances Using Direct Petition Method: E - L - Annexation Ordinances Using Direct Petition Method: M - O
Annexation Ordinances Using Direct Petition Method: M - O - Annexation Ordinances Using Direct Petition Method: P - Z
Annexation Ordinances Using Direct Petition Method: P - Z - Annexation Ordinances Using Direct Petition Method: A - D
Annexation Ordinances Using Direct Petition Method: A - D