skip navigation
Share this:


MRSC Insight Blog


Posts for Ramsey Ramerman

Supreme Court: Fire District Email Policy Violated First Amendment

Supreme Court: Fire District Email Policy Violated First Amendment

A recent Washington Supreme Court ruling found that the Spokane Valley Fire District's policy prohibiting employees from using department email accounts to send religious messages violated the First Amendment. This post looks at the implications for public agencies statewide. 

Read more

The Supreme Court Narrowly Construes the “Minimum-Value” Executive Session Exception to the OPMA

The Supreme Court Narrowly Construes the “Minimum-Value” Executive Session Exception to the OPMA

On June 8, the Washington Supreme Court issued its opinion in Columbia Riverkeepers v. Port of Vancouver, adopting a very narrow interpretation of the executive session “exception” to the OPMA for discussion about the sale or lease of real estate (the “minimum-value exception”). In this blog post, guest author Ramsey Ramerman breaks down the case. 

Read more

Agencies Must Provide a “Reasonable Time Estimate” in their 5-day Response, Even When Seeking Clarification.

Agencies Must Provide a “Reasonable Time Estimate” in their 5-day Response, Even When Seeking Clarification.

In this blog post, guest author Ramsey Ramerman provides an overview of the Washington Court of Appeals' recent decision in Hikel v. City of Lynnwood, where the court held that a reasonable time estimate is always required with an agency's response to a PRA request that does not fully resolve the request, even when the agency seeks clarification that may affect that time estimate.

Read more

Addressing Disruptions at Public Meetings

When members of the public disrupt a public meeting, the disruption poses several challenges for the governing body. A recent incident at a local school district highlights the procedural hoops a governing body must go through if they attempt to address the disruption by adjourning the meeting and reconvening it in another location. A recent federal case from California exposes liability risks...

Read more

Court Holds Agencies Can Enforce Their Public Records Act Policies

The 2008 decision Parmelee v. Clarke held that because the requester had actual knowledge of the agency's public records procedures, the requester was required to follow those procedures and make public records requests to the identified officer.

Read more

Supreme Court Underscores the Requirement to Produce an Exemption Log under the PRA

The 2009 Supreme Court ruling Rental Housing Authority v. City of Des Moines ruled that the city did not trigger the one-year statute of limitations for Public Records Act claims until after the city had produced its "PAWS II" exemption log.

Read more

LOAD MORE